Importance Of Experts Opinions In Search For Knowledge Philosophy Essay

Importance Of Experts Opinions In Search For Knowledge Philosophy look forSearching through newspapers, TV news or radio I can easily find the so c totallyed rulings of secures. Almost every clause in The Economist, Guardian consists of at least(prenominal) two quotations of economists, sociologists or lawyers who are in the main professors of the world most famous Universities such asOxford, Cambridge, Harvard, bird cry or workers of the specialised institutes. All these ideas whitethorn be useful in gaining acquaintance yet would itbe healthy to uncritically accept them asadefinite companionship or call it my own familiarity? To answer the question of how important are the opinions of experts in the search of shaftledge I will carry come to the fore an in depth abbreviation ofthree main aspects. First of all Iwill turn up to examine who anexpert is and what conditions need to be completed in orderliness tocall someone an place inaspecific plain. Secondly, I will f ocus on the process oftransforming anopinion into myown knowledge. The break aspect will set down where doexperts gain their knowledge and what are the bases of their opinions. I believe that an compend of these three dimensions, extended by an exemplifications of my everyday life and based on specific theater of operationss ofknowledge, will be,to big extent, sufficient for answering whether experts and their opinions are able to let mewith an adequate point to accept itasa accredited component ofmyknowledge.As I was think backing of how to define an expert I ended up realizing how involved the perception of experts is. I would say that there is no one, ideal definition. just as I think about it,this isa person who receive an in depth knowledge in a specific field and relying mostly on the empirical evidence makes researches developing his/hers own taking into custody ofaspecific phenomenon. My brief definition seems to find anapplication in everyday life for example p rofessors from Universities specify only in peg down fields and by probing particular factors, they form their own turn out conclusions which are further presented inmagazines or books asexperts opinions. AsIam most interested ineconomics it seems most reasonable to evoke anauthority specialising in this area. Let me focus on Leszek Balcerowicz, who is considered anexpert in regulating the interference ofthe government onthe market. First of all hegraduated from the economics faculty, performed inthe most respected content and European posts and was an author of the famous Balcerowicz Plan which transformed Polish sparing what provided him with anempirical evidence. Tomymind hepossesses enough knowledge to form reliable conclusions ofwhat heobserves inmarket. Yet we need to be aware that heisdevoted toaspecific economics school monetarism, therefore his opinions may betosome extent subordinate tohis person-to-person beliefs orbiases. merely whenever I see his opinion being e xpressed I know that it will for sure affect my cause of a given show window ashis authority based on experience, reasoning and although inevitably emotions and personal attitude are sufficient for me to call him anauthority whose opinion I base on when creating my own conclusions, point of view that Icall my own. Itmay be claimed that I treat Balcerowicz as an expert except because Iamsympathetic to his creed yet purge heap that have contradictory economical opinions doaccept his high appointments and repel his opinion into consideration at least to confront their and Balcerowiczs ideas. Therefore an authority is not only a person that people agree with and dowery the equal opinion but rathersomeone who canprovide us with evidence of his claims.The process of transforming opinion into knowledge is also price focusing. Studying in the IB programme I realized that experts opinions are only hints that help to interpret facts more widely. The most important thing for me was rea lising that even ifan expert does his/her best to be fair minded a chomp of subjectivity is inevitable. Yet as I became aware of it the subjectivity turned out to have its positive effects. Historical experts seem tothrive on the conflicts between their opinions about events in their search for knowledge and better understanding ofthe past. The same event can attract vastly different opinions, for example the causes of the First World War. Marxist historians blame the development of capitalism whether as German historian, Geiss blames the failure ofdiplomacy.1Hence being a critically thinking person the contradiction of experts opinions makes me understand the problem inawider way, break apart of who Itrust more, whose evidence is strongly supported and hammer out a compromise.Experts are not born specialists, they gain knowledge and collect towork and understanding ofspecific processes they may start being sensed as authorities within the area of their interest. Yet my look impacts mainly muniment, natural sciences, human sciences but when itcomes to ethics the knowledge that books or expertises may provide becomes less usable. For example my m some other is for me the expert of husband married woman relations instead ofthe fact that her knowledge is based only on personal experience. Yet the evidence she can provide me with her successful kin with my father is at that point sufficient for me.The evidence is in my opinion the most important thing trance starting to believe insomething and gaining my own understanding of a given thing (note that in the presented search I am not discussing religion beliefs). First of all the opinion needs to have rational grounds. This means that if my history teacher utter that the First World War started asaconsequence of the assassination of Grand Duke Constantine without giving any proof orexplanation I would be care doubt whether itis reliable and true. up to now if he supported it with opinions ofother ex perts, primary extensions (which may be for example some political documents) orother evidence the thesis would became more reliable and therefore probably accepted byme for further consideration of context.The last aspect of my concern is the origin of the need to rely on the opinions of experts. Looking for example at arts, what do I need experts opinions for? As it is the most subjective area of knowledge at first I almost saw no difference whether a ikon was commented byan expert oranon expert. The only difference that I considered worth pointing was the fact that experts may be more used to commenting on arts and therefore their language and energy toexpress feelings may be clearer and more focused. However, as I thought about it more I realized that there is at least one more aspect. A good example is De Aardappeleters (The Potato Eaters) by Vincent van Gogh which I found to create different interpretations indifferent context. When I showed the painting to my friends, alm ost all of them found it routine and only one person out of ten recognized the author. However when I showed them the painting once more, but prefacing it with a history of chef-doeuvre and Van Goghs assumptions (therefore I was acting like anexpert) all of them changed their attitude towards the painting and started to see it with a wider perspective appreciating the atmosphere and bright idea.To my mind when it comes to history experts opinions are one of the most important aspects ingaining knowledge for me. unconstipated the primary sources, which seem to be most reliable and unspoiled source of knowledge, have to be interpreted as well. Therefore experts act like an interpreters. Due to their contrary opinions they create anopportunity for me to see different attitudes to the same event. This not only extends myperspective but also reminds me that expression at things from only one point of view is like not looking at them at all.To conclude in my opinion experts opinions ar e valuable in the search of knowledge. Authorities opinions may be sometimes misleading, pretermit evidence but as I take them into consideration while creating my own point of view I believe that it provides me with better analysis of the subject. Each opinion is somehow true therefore, whenever an expert or anon expert expresses an opinion I think that it expends my perspective and hence makes methink more specifically on the problem, analyse it and create my own conclusion.