then who do we believe? Essays -- essays research papers fc

The Ultimate DilemaThere argon several rock-steadyty precautions that we as humans take to ensure our safety. valet most commonly test things before selling or victimisation them. This can repeal liability and make sure products ar safe. Cosmetics be among the legion(predicate) pillowcases of products that atomic number 18 being tested such as fragrances, toiletries, and cosmetics that are tested on millions of brutes each year. This has created several controversies between animal rights activists and cosmetic manufacturers. Especi each(prenominal)y in the European Union Council of Ministers where they want to ban animal testing as soon as they can develop seemly alternatives (Milmo, 6). This is because several animals are employ in experimentations to test if products are safe for us to use. Tests like the Draize Irritancy and Skin Tests, where products are put in the eyeb alone of rabbits to test irritations, and the LD50, where several animals are exposed to a chem ical are considered ways of torture. But luckily several corporations are discovering new and current ways to replace animals with science and technology to help reduce the substance of animals used. So because testing on animals are absolutely necessary for our safety, as consumers, we do not have the right to use animals in this type of manner, but we should reduce the occur of tests by replacing many with alternatives. Although this seems wrong, it is the crowning(prenominal) necessity for human safety in cosmetic use. wildcats have been used in cosmetic safety testing primarily because they share similarities to humans. They are quick and easy to use because they live short lives and are considerably accessible. Most animals are raised only for testing, and experimentation is really all that they know. So they really are not taken out of their essential habitat for testing. Testing has been so distinguished to corporations because they are trying to avoid being branded a s unsafe. Testing also has been so important that they help avoid liability lawsuits and bad publicity from unsafe products (Hunter, 30). It all started in 1933 when a woman wanted to thicken her eyelashes. But afterward applying the dye to her lashes and accidentally to her eyes, she suffered for about three months. This woman, that the Federal Drug governing body calls Mrs. Brown, eventually went blind. Congress then passe... ...re are so many alternatives available now there really should not be a reason why a corporation would not reduce the amount of animals used. The newer techniques offer chances to obtain data faster, less expensively, and more humanely (Hunter, 26). whole kit and boodle CitedAnthes, Gary H. P&G Uses Data Mining to Cut Animal Testing. electronic computer World 33 (1999) 44-45.Finsen, Lawrence, Susan Finsen. The Animal Movement in America From favor to Respect. New York Twayne, 1994.Fox, Michael Allen. The Case For Animal Experimentation An Evolutionary and Ethical Perspective. capital of the United Kingdom University of California Press Ltd., 1986.Hunter, Beatrice Trum. New Alternatives in Safety Testing. Consumer Research magazine publisher 83(2002) 26- 30.McCoy, J.J. Animals in Research Issues and Conflicts. New York Franklin Watts, Inc., 1993.Milmo, Sean. Ultimate Showdown Looms For Animal Tested Cosmetics. Chemical MarketReporter 261 (2001) 6, 28.Planet for the Taking series Ultimate Slavery Dir. Nancy Archibald. Film Incorporated..