Max’s Burger Case Study Essay

causal agency Summery goos Burger is an emerge American fast- fodder chain with dealershipd outlet across the world. Nassar group bought the franchise rights of Maxs Burger outlet in Dubai. There were umpteen fast-food outlet of franchised restaurants in Dubai, among them Maxs Burgers essence quality was cut down standard. As Nassar group didnt deprivation to jeopardize their reputation. The ordered the warehouse passenger car to decline any rimy food shipment that doesnt meet the franchise standard. When the shipment came, the rimed meaning temperature was elfin bit off which would not jeopardy customers health precisely would affect the food taste. Though the bus didnt considered the little mismatch of the temperature before, like a shot he is having second thoughts.Question-1Does the close to contract or forswear the frozen meat shipment call for good or legal considerations? Why?AnswerYes , the finality to consent or refuse the frozen meat shipment call for honest or legal consideration. As we use up seen in this case there is an ethical consideration regarding temperature problem. The temperature of the frozen meat delivered to the Maxs burgers didnt match the presidential terms standard. If they accept it they will adjourn the law. Though the deviation is little, but it puts a question on this ethical issues.Question-2 break the stakeholders who will be influenced by the decision to accept or refuse to the frozen meat shipment?Answer twain Nassar group and the company supplying the meat are the stakeholders who will be influenced by the decision to accept or refuse the frozen meat shipment. If Nasaar group accept the frozen meat shipment, their sale whitethorn be decreased as a result of inconsistency.